發表於 2013-1-20 23:08
|
為了計算巴西股市的 ACPE
(BUT 在巴西股市的網站 ,遍尋不著 PE RATIO
只好以 EWZ 之PER 代替)
在計算過程中, 我發覺 ISHARE.COM 的 FUND FACT SHEET
中 PER 是靜態市盈率 (也就是 , 2012 公佈 PER 是 以2011年的全年盈餘來算,不再變動)
與 YAHOO (DATA FROM MORNING STAR)中 PER 為TTM(追蹤前12個月盈餘) 不同 ( 滾動市盈率)
神奇的是..........
ACPE(3 YEAR)=13 為 EWZ=49.298 與最低點 EWZ=48.27
竟只差 2% (又再一次......是巧合????? 也太神了吧???) ---.............................
我猜 :是很多法人, 利用類似評價方式,進場買股
|
Allan-san:
回覆刪除I have one concern; that is, Dr. Wang's theory also applies to Brazilian market? What if Brazilian market historically presents a lower PE?
What is the PE for EWZ between 2008 to 2009? I think it is much lower than 13.
I looked at my brokerage accounts, TD Ameritrade, Scottrade and Merrill Edge and they don't show PE for EWZ.
HI YULIN:
回覆刪除you can find PE of ewz from etf fact sheet over ishare .com
(i collect the data from there- only 2010,2011,2012)
i tried hard to find historical PE of the brazilian stock market,
but it failed , cause i can not find that from brazilian stock exchage company--http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br/en-us/home.aspx?idioma=en-us
therefore , i can not backtest the ACPE of Dr wang's theory .
對阿, 同意你的看法
但我對 巴西己經投降..., 因資訊收集困難, 可能要有 BLOOMBERG 的付費 DATABASE, 才可研究
hi yulin:
回覆刪除but you can find historical pe from the chart over
http://allanlin998.blogspot.tw/2013/02/gdp-2013-4.html
Allan-san:
回覆刪除Thanks for the response. I will look into the information you provided.
回覆刪除hi yulin
u are welcome
作者已經移除這則留言。
回覆刪除